|
ATCC
treatment nasal epithelial cells necs Treatment Nasal Epithelial Cells Necs, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/treatment nasal epithelial cells necs/product/ATCC Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
treatment nasal epithelial cells necs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-02
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
PromoCell
cell lines primary human nasal epithelial cells promocell Cell Lines Primary Human Nasal Epithelial Cells Promocell, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cell lines primary human nasal epithelial cells promocell/product/PromoCell Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell lines primary human nasal epithelial cells promocell - by Bioz Stars,
2026-02
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
PromoCell
nasal epithelial cells ![]() Nasal Epithelial Cells, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/nasal epithelial cells/product/PromoCell Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nasal epithelial cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-02
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
PromoCell
hnepc cells ![]() Hnepc Cells, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hnepc cells/product/PromoCell Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hnepc cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-02
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Journal of Virology
Article Title: Resistance of endothelial cells to SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro
doi: 10.1128/jvi.01205-25
Figure Lengend Snippet: mRNA expression of ACE2, TMPRSS2 , BSG , PPIA , and PPIB in human nasal epithelial cells (NECs) and endothelial cells (aortic, microvascular, and blood outgrowth). Expression levels for the genes ACE2 ( A ), TMPRSS2 ( B ), BSG ( C ), PPIA ( D ), and PPIB ( E ) were obtained from aortic (AoEC), microvascular (HMVEC), and blood outgrowth (BOEC) endothelial cells and NECs. Data for each donor were normalized using the average of the housekeepers (18S and Gapdh) and analyzed using a comparative Ct method (2ΔΔCt). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM fold change compared to nasal epithelium ( n = 3 wells using cells from two donors) for AoEC ( n = 3 wells using cells of three separate donors), HMVEC ( n = 3 wells using cells of three separate donors and BOECs ( n = 2 wells using cells of two separate donors).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing
Journal: Journal of Virology
Article Title: Resistance of endothelial cells to SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro
doi: 10.1128/jvi.01205-25
Figure Lengend Snippet: SARS-CoV-2 virus infection in human airway epithelial cells in air:liquid interface, Vero E6, and endothelial cells. Human airway epithelial cells grown in an air:liquid interface (MucilAir) were infected with SARS-CoV-2 live virus (MOI = 0.1). Infectious virus released to the apical side of the epithelium was determined over time (6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection) ( A ). In separate studies, the levels of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid or spike protein in Vero E6 and endothelial cells (treated with media only [untreated] or IL-1β [10 ng/mL; 3 h]) at 24 ( B ) and 72 ( C ) h post-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (MOI = 0.1) were determined using fluorescent imaging. Mock controls (media only) experiments were run simultaneously using each endothelial cell line. Data are shown as n = 3 (pooled donors) for Mucilair cells ( A ) and n = 3 (separate donors) for human aortic (AoEC), lung microvascular (HMVEC), and blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOECs). Data are shown as mean ± SEM for (A) and representative images shown for (B) and (C) (scale bar = 25 µm).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Virus, Infection, Imaging
50 ] complex and its downstream signaling pathway. b) Induction of representative ISG expression ( Isg15, Mx1, and Oas1 ) in HNEpCs after 12‐h treatment with recombinant hIFN‐λs WT, analyzed by RT‐qPCR ( n = 3). mRNA levels were calculated relative to non‐treated controls and normalized to human 18s rRNA expression. c) First‐derivative plots (dF/dT) of thermal shift assays for calculating melting temperatures (Tm). 12.5 µg of each hIFN‐λ was mixed with 2.5 µL of diluted Protein Thermal Shift Dye. Tm values, corresponding to the peak dF/dT temperature, are indicated. d) Surface representation of hIFN‐λ3 (PDB code: 3HHC). [ Journal: Advanced Science
Article Title: Computational Design and Glycoengineering of Interferon‐Lambda for Nasal Prophylaxis Against Respiratory Viruses
doi: 10.1002/advs.202506764
Figure Lengend Snippet: Structure analysis and computational design strategy for thermostable and proteolysis‐resistant hIFN‐λ3. a) The 3D structure of the hIFN‐λ3/hIFN‐λR1/hIL‐10Rβ (PDB code: 5T5W) [
Article Snippet: For ISG induction in
Techniques: Expressing, Recombinant, Quantitative RT-PCR, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Generated, Selection, Control
Journal: Advanced Science
Article Title: Computational Design and Glycoengineering of Interferon‐Lambda for Nasal Prophylaxis Against Respiratory Viruses
doi: 10.1002/advs.202506764
Figure Lengend Snippet: Biological activity and thermal aggregation resistance of hIFN‐λ3‐DE1 under acute and long‐term heat stress. a) Relative mRNA expression of representative ISGs ( Isg15, Mx1, and Oas1 ) in HNEpCs following 12‐h treatment with hIFN‐λ3‐WT or hIFN‐λ3‐DE1 (100 ng mL −1 ), with or without short‐term heat stress (70 °C for 5 min). mRNA levels were analyzed by RT‐qPCR ( n = 3), normalized to 18s rRNA , and expressed relative to non‐treated controls. b) Short‐term thermal aggregation profiles of hIFN‐λ3‐WT and hIFN‐λ3‐DE1 after 5‐min incubation at the indicated temperatures (25, 50, 60, 70, 80, or 90 °C). Residual soluble protein concentrations were quantified (n = 3). c) Relative ISG expression ( Isg15, Mx1, and Oas1 ) in HNEpCs treated with hIFN‐λ3‐WT or hIFN‐λ3‐DE1 (100 ng mL −1 ) after long‐term incubation at 45 or 50 °C for 2 weeks. RT‐qPCR was performed as in (a) ( n = 3). d) Long‐term thermal aggregation of hIFN‐λ3‐WT and hIFN‐λ3‐DE1 during 2‐week incubation at 45 or 50 °C. Protein solubility was monitored over time ( n = 3). All data represent mean ± SD from independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by one‐way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparisons test (0.001<** P <0.01, 0.0001<*** P < 0.001, **** P <0.0001 vs control and ns is not significant). n.t., non‐treat; WT, hIFN‐λ3‐WT; DE1, hIFN‐λ3‐DE1.
Article Snippet: For ISG induction in
Techniques: Activity Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Incubation, Solubility, Control